Fearing calls for living wage jobs

The Goldendale Sentinel published this story about George on June 26th. We wanted to share it with you.

Fourth Congressional District candidate George Fearing made an appearance in Goldendale Friday.

The candidate, who spoke at a Klickitat County Democrats meeting, listed living wage jobs and scenic area protection as among his top priorities.

“Klickitat County needs more jobs and I would like to see some companies come here to develop alternative sources of energy such as wind power,” said the Democratic candidate.

“If we don’t do something soon, that aluminum plant is going to be torn down and used for parts.”

The Tri-Cities-area attorney, who cited listening as one of his political strengths, likened the legislative process to practicing law.

“A Congressman is like a lawyer,” he said. “You represent people and you put aside your own interests.”

Other issues the candidate touched on included public financing in campaigns, cleaning up the Hanford nuclear site, and changing current war policies.

“When I say I’m a pro-life Democrat, I mean I do not support 4,000 lives being lost in Iraq,” he said.

“I’m a pro-life Democrat who believes we need to care for our GIs when they come home.

The candidate is running against Republican incumbent Congressman Doc Hastings.

Although the Kennewick man said he firmly believes in the harmful effects global warming and runs a Democratic platform, he is not the typical liberal.

For example, the son of a Christian minister is a staunch advocate of Second Amendment gun ownership rights and said he wants to bridge party barriers.

“I’m here for Republicans and Democrats, I’m here for rich and poor, and I will listen to everyone.”

The congressional hopeful was joined at the Democratic meeting by other candidates Jerry Gaines, running for District Three County Commissioner, and District 15 State Representative candidates John Gotts and Tao Berman.

Issues on those candidate’s platforms included job creation, accessible healthcare, recycling, education, and ending the war. They also talked about bringing local services to the community.

“We don’t have enough senior citizen facilities,” said Gaines, who is from Bickleton. “We don’t have enough after school activities for the kids.”

“I like Klickitat County and I want to make a difference. I want to make it the best county around.”

George Fearing attends the State Convention

The George Fearing Campaign attended the Washington State Democratic Convention this past weekend in Spokane. We met many great citizens from every corner of the state, and all were behind George’s message of change and renewing leadership for the heart of Washington.

George charmed the delegation with a rousing speech on Saturday afternoon. He turned a few heads when he announced he was a pro-life Democrat:

“I do not appreciate the religious right’s monopolization of the term pro-life, because as a Democrat I am pro-life.

I am a pro-life Democrat who does not want unnecessary wars that kill young American heroes and innocent Iraqi civilians. I am a pro-life Democrat who believes America has an obligation to provide first class health care and mental health services to our returning veterans to preserve their lives and America has an obligation to pay for a college education for our veterans.

I am a pro-life Democrat who wants working families to receive decent living wages and to spend leisure time with their families and I recognize the need for strong labor unions to insure working family wages. I am a pro-life Democrat who wants all Americans to receive proper health care.

I am a pro-life Democrat who recognizes the intrinsic value of everyone’s life and that each life is of equal value. I am a pro-life Democrat who believes a woman should control her own life and body, including making reproductive decisions with her physician without the interference of the government.”

It was a memorable moment in a passionate speech, and a line on the minds and tongues of Democrats later that night in the convention hallways and hospitality suites and at the Spokane Democrats Salmon Feed.

George also emphasized that Washington is not two separate states, but Eastern Washington and Western Washington share many values and ideals.

We in Central Washington know the commonalities of both halves of the state more than anyone else. We are diverse, yet unified.

George and all of us in the campaign are thrilled to see the support, passion and enthusiasm from not only Democrats here in the 4th Congressional District but our friends across the state! The gracious reception from activists and party leaders alike is truly inspiring.

There are so many notable races and candidates across the state as well as the nation. It’d be overwhelming to name them all, but we have some other competitive congressional races here in Washington that are worth mentioning.

Mark Mays is running for Congress in Washington’s 5th, right next door to the 4th. We’re proud to stand by Mark in his bid to unseat Cathy McMorris Rodgers. He is a fine choice for representative of the people of Eastern Washington.

Darcy Burner’s race in Washington’s 8th congressional district is one that the entire country is watching. Darcy is admired for her values and commitment to public service. Darcy lead the charge in providing a unified voice opposing the current politics over the War in Iraq, spearheading the effort to draft and push the Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq. Many candidates for Congress have signed on to this plan, including George Fearing. We are confident that Darcy will be headed to Congress with George this November. There are few better congressional candidates in the nation.

Thank you for joining us in our efforts. Please support George’s run for Congress by donating to the campaign today. Please also support our friends across Washington state.

Washington State Democrats
Darcy Burner for Washington’s 8th
Chris Gregoire for Governor
John Ladenburg for Attorney General
Jim McIntire for State Treasurer

Fearing & Hastings Agree on Protecting Wenatchee Valley Clinic

Hastings ill-equipped to get job done


Central Washington’s Democratic Congressional candidate George Fearing announces his opposition to any legislation or regulation that would prohibit Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement to physician-owned facilities, which include the Wenatchee Valley Clinic.

Fearing notes the unfairness and irrationality of allowing reimbursement to a facility owned by a large for-profit corporation, headquartered in another state, while denying reimbursement to a facility owned by local medical practitioners. The federal government should encourage local ownership of health care facilities.

“We are in absolute agreement on this issue,” noted Fearing. “The question is who will work better in the Democratic Congress to ensure it stays protected.”

Hastings has attempted to protect the Wenatchee Valley Medical Center for months, but has been unable to pass any legislation to help the clinic.

Alternatively, Senator Patty Murray, a member of the Appropriations Committee and the Senate Democratic leadership, has taken steps to ensure the clinic remains open. She secured a special dispensation to help Wenatchee Valley Medical Center. This bill recently passed in the Senate, and will come up soon in the House.

On June 8th, the New York Times reported that Senator Murray’s assistance was essential to protect the hospital. Without the Senior Senator from Washington’s help, the hospital may have been forced to either close its doors or sell 60 percent of its stock.

“The real issue here is who can get results for Central Washington,” commented George Fearing. “Mr. Hastings has been working on this issue for a long time and has gotten nothing accomplished. Working with the Democratic Congress and our strong Senators, I know we can protect the Wenatchee Valley Medical Center for a long time.”

Hastings ‘missing in action’ on G.I. Bill

Fearing calls vote ‘cruel and unfair’

Democratic congressional candidate, George Fearing, today criticized Doc Hastings for being “missing in action”, and failing to support the 21st Century GI Bill which updates college education benefits for combat veterans serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. Congressman Hastings first voted against the GI Bill last May and now has a chance to change and support this bill, which awaits another vote in the House following Senate action two weeks ago.

“Honoring our troops means honoring them when they come back home, not just when they are serving on a battlefield in Iraq,” said Fearing. “After standing up again and again to serve under the most terrible conditions, I call on Doc Hastings to stand up and give them a chance at a first rate education. Helping our GI’s get through college is the best investment our country can make, for their future and ours. We know that a college graduate earns at least $500,000 more in their lifetime, and with our economy in a downturn, we need a highly skilled and educated workforce to lead us out of recession.”

Fearing cited a l988 Congressional study which found that every dollar spent on educational benefits under the original GI Bill added seven dollars to the national economy in terms of productivity, consumer spending and tax revenue. Fearing also noted, “the original GI Bill, first signed into law in 1944 by President Franklin Roosevelt, is credited with building America’s strong middle class following WW II. Today there are seven current US Senators and many members of Congress who received their college education because of the GI Bill.”

Although the original GI bill paid full tuition, housing and living costs for some 8 million vets, over time it has been scaled back to the point where the maximum a veteran can receive is $9,000 per year, which covers a little more than half the costs of attending a four year public university.

Under the new GI Bill, members of the military, including guards and reservists, who have served on active duty since 9/11 are eligible to receive education benefits equaling the highest tuition rate of the most expensive in-state public university, along with a monthly housing stipend which is to be determined by geographical area. It also creates a dollar-for-dollar match for contributions from private educational institutions that have higher tuition rates than those covered under the bill.

Fearing criticized Republicans who have opposed the GI Bill on the grounds it will hurt re-enlistment and retention rates. “Denying college benefits to our veterans because you are afraid they will not re-enlist for combat is cruel and unfair. Divorce rates for these military personnel are up 65% and their suicide rate is twice as high as the national average. After serving their fourth or fifth tours of duty, they have earned the right to stay home, graduate college and begin earning a decent living for themselves and their families. It’s the least we can do for them.”

Fearing also cited a current report by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office stating that any loss in troop retention and re-enlistment would be balanced out by an equal increase in new recruits attracted into the military by the prospects of college education.

Republican Senator John Warner, who supports the new GI Bill compared this legislation to “putting a big piece of cheese out there, which will induce more qualified people to join just to get this. It should be a tremendous incentive for recruitment.”

Some Republicans have asserted that these new GI Bill college benefits are too costly, although this bill appropriates only $2.5 billion per year, roughly equivalent to what we are now spending for just one week in Iraq.

President Bush has signaled he will veto the new GI Bill and Hastings is expected to stand with the President in any attempt to override this veto, as Hastings has a record of voting with Bush over 90% of the time. Fearing is calling upon veterans and concerned citizens to call or write Hastings’ office in Pasco at (509) 543-9396, Yakima (509) 452-3243, or Washington DC (202) 225-3251, and urge him to support this bill.

The 21st Century GI Bill, first introduced by Senator Jim Webb, was co-sponsored by Republican Senators Chuck Hagel and John Warner. It is widely endorsed by veterans’ organizations, including the non-partisan Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA), the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW). Currently Republicans have offered up a water-down GI Bill in the Senate, which excludes many service members by allocating the most generous benefits to soldiers who have served at least 12 years. The Webb-Hagel-Warner GI Bill would provide full college benefits to combat veterans after 3 years of service.

Hastings’ partisan history haunts district

On June 4th, the Grand Coulee Star published a press release from Doc Hastings decrying a recent failure of his on the House floor. On June 11th the Star published our response:

Congressman Richard Hastings has spent his political life engaging in partisan conflict, and our children are paying the price.

On June 4, The Star Online ran a press release from Congressman Hastings on his failure to have Congress adopt two amendments he proposed to an education bill related to the federal government’s responsibilities under the Impact Aid program. Hastings would have us believe that his amendments were blocked because the Democratic Congress does not want to fund education.

This explanation is absurd on its face. Democrats have fought long and hard to fund education because we know it is important to prepare our children to compete in a global society. The explanation is especially preposterous in light of the fact that the bill in question was to authorize $20 billion of federal spending for school construction and maintenance.

The truth is that the reason the House Leadership won’t listen to Hastings has nothing to do with ideology, and everything to do with Hastings’ long history as a partisan politician. Since his election to Congress in 1994, and during his tenure as a state representative before, Hastings built his entire career on partisan politics. Hastings has never built alliances with anyone on the other side of the aisle. He prides himself on practicing politics as a perpetual partisan attack.

Doc Hastings almost always votes with his party’s leadership. After he votes with his party, he blames the Democrats.

Hastings’ quotes in your June 4 article about his failure to get his amendments passed were more partisan attacks. Hastings was successful with this unproductive behavior with Republicans in the majority, but now that they are not, central Washington pays the price. That’s why it’s time for a change. Democrats are in the majority in Congress, and will be in the extended future. Doc Hastings’ partisan ways will thus continue to harm our district.

Unfortunately, Hastings never accomplished anything even when his party controlled Congress. His ability to accomplish anything is even worse now. As long as Congress continues to be controlled by the Democrats, Hastings is going to continue to be ignored. His failed amendments related to the Impact Aid program are just another example of his inability to adequately represent our interests.